BEGIN:VCALENDAR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//github.com/rianjs/ical.net//NONSGML ical.net 4.0//EN
VERSION:2.0
X-FROM-URL:https://eom.sdu.dk/events/ical/cb7ec91f-948e-47ec-ba2a-46100b70
 2599
X-WR-CALNAME:DIAS event: Reproducible research\, peer review\, and researc
 h assessment: how do they mix? by John Ioannidis
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Copenhagen
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Copenhagen
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTAMP:20260508T155854Z
DTSTART:20261028T030000
SEQUENCE:0
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
UID:037da131-a88c-40ed-9d9b-f79d51d90c12
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTAMP:20260508T155854Z
DTSTART:20260325T020000
SEQUENCE:0
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
UID:b25f0b74-7269-4b57-8e14-288c2eb5830c
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:There is increasing evidence that most scientific research doe
 s not meet standards of reproducibility and transparency. Concurrently\, 
 there are many efforts to improve the reproducibility\, transparency\, an
 d eventually the credibility and usefulness of scientific evidence. Peer 
 review is a central mechanism for vetting\, correcting\, and improving sc
 ience. However\, it has met with a broadening range of challenges\, as 7 
 million papers are published every year\, publication systems are over-co
 mmercialized\, and reviewers are overfatigued. Many scholars argue that r
 esearch assessment in general\, if done properly for individuals and inst
 itutions\, can be a major tool for enhancing research design\, conduct\, 
 and outcomes. A central quest is whether proper incentives are provided a
 nd reinforced. Many ideas are proposed for changing peer review and resea
 rch assessment\, but few of them have solid evidence.\n\n[b]About John P.
 A. Ioannidis[/b]\nJohn P.A. Ioannidis\, MD\, DSc was born in New York Cit
 y and raised in Athens\, Greece. He trained at Athens College\, Universit
 y of Athens (medicine and DSc in biopathology)\, Harvard and Tufts (inter
 nal medicine\, infectious diseases)\, and then held positions at NIH\, Jo
 hns Hopkins\, Tufts\, Harvard\, Imperial College\, and University of Ioan
 nina. He moved to Stanford in 2010 where he is Professor of Medicine\, of
  Epidemiology and Population Heath\, and (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data
  Science. He launched the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (ME
 TRICS) in 2013. He has served as President of the Society for Research Sy
 nthesis Methodology and of the Association of American Physicians\, as ed
 itorial board member of many leading journals and as Editor-in-Chief of t
 he European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He has been elected to man
 y honorific academies and has received 6 honorary doctoral degrees and ma
 ny awards. He is the author of ten literary books\, three of them shortli
 sted for best book of the year Anagnostis awards in Greece. His work aims
  to improve research methods and practices and to enhance approaches to i
 ntegrating information and generating reliable evidence. \n\n[b]Venue[/b]
 \nThe DIAS Auditorium\, SDU Campus Odense\n\n[i]This event is open for al
 l. No registration needed.[/i]
DTEND:20250430T101500Z
DTSTAMP:20260508T155854Z
DTSTART:20250430T091500Z
LOCATION:Syddansk Universitet\, Fioniavej 34\, 5230\, Odense M
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:DIAS event: Reproducible research\, peer review\, and research ass
 essment: how do they mix? by John Ioannidis
UID:8a8941ec-61f2-4128-ba78-badd22aa83b1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
